Voyager Suite
Virtuoso
Investment Suite
RentCafe Suite
REACH by RentCafe
CommercialCafe Suite
Elevate Suite
Procure to Pay Suite
Aspire
Yardi Kube Suite
Yardi Corom
The numbers behind UK build to rent tell two completely different stories depending on which ones you read first. Read the investment figures and the sector looks unstoppable – a record £5.3 billion deployed in 2025, a further £3 billion in the first half of 2026 alone, occupancy averaging 97% and rental demand that continues to outpace supply by a significant margin.
However, read the pipeline data and it looks like a market in retreat – in 2026, construction starts collapsed 65% year on year, 23 out of 32 London boroughs recorded no new starts at all in 2025, and the pipeline has recorded more completions than starts for eight consecutive quarters. Both are true simultaneously and the tension between them is the defining challenge for BTR in 2026.
The gap is not a lack of demand – capital is willing to invest. The real question is why so little of it is reaching the development market. Understanding where the funding structure is breaking down is key to identifying where the greatest opportunities lie.
A Funding Model That Has Run Out of Road
Forward-funding is a model where an institutional investor commits capital to a scheme before construction begins. This approach was essential in developing the UK BTR sector. It succeeded because key variables, such as planning timelines, construction costs, and building safety were relatively predictable. However, all three have changed significantly. As predictability decreases, the fixed-return structures required by forward-funding become less viable.
Furthermore, the result is a sector where capital is abundant but increasingly reluctant to fund new development. Around two-thirds of H1 2026 BTR investment targeted existing, income-producing stock rather than new schemes, with North American investors accounting for 60% of total activity – nearly double the domestic share – reversing a five-year trend in which UK-based capital dominated. The appetite for the asset class is global, yet the pipeline is not keeping up.
As Alanna Peach, head of living capital markets at Colliers, stated during a fireside chat on the subject of, “What Is Happening on the Ground and Where Next?”, the answer lies in more creative approaches to capital deployment. For example, blended finance, public-private partnerships and schemes built around the affordability and tenure mix that planning policies increasingly demand. Peach further noted that continuing to fit new development conditions into an older funding template is not a strategy, it is a holding position.
The Stock That Capital Will Follow
The shift in how capital is being deployed points clearly to where the opportunity lies. Schemes that cannot clear the viability bar in London are not failing because demand is weak. They are failing because the cost base, planning obligations and building safety requirements make the numbers unworkable at market rents. Capital is already drawing that conclusion and moving to where viability holds.
Andrew Brentnall, head of residential investment and development – operational capital markets at Savills expressed during a panel that the affordability and cost profile of a scheme are now what decides whether institutional capital can follow. Knight Frank’s Single Family Housing report shows that SFH’s share of total BTR deal volumes surged from just 2% in 2020 to 43% in 2024, with £4.4 billion invested in the sector since 2020 – and the driver is not fashion but fundamentals. Single-family schemes can be delivered faster, at a lower cost per unit, in locations where affordability is less stretched, and where the occupier base is structurally committed to renting long-term.
Brentnall also highlighted that the same logic points to where risk is concentrated. Lease-up risk is highest at the premium end of the market, where returns are hardest to protect when conditions tighten. The panel agreed that the schemes with the most durable investment case are not the tallest or the best-specified – they are the ones that residents can afford.
The Infrastructure That Decides Who Wins
Knowing where to invest is one thing. However, being able to operate, scale and report on those investments (to the standards institutional capital expects) is what determines whether that capital stays.
At the operational level, institutional investment still represents just 0.2% of all privately rented homes in the UK, according to Knight Frank – highlighting both the scale of the opportunity ahead and the complexity that comes with it. Managing hundreds of units across multiple schemes brings a range of operational demands. Maintaining compliance under the Renters’ Rights Act 2025, pricing rents accurately across postcodes and coordinating lease renewals without compromising occupancy all require a centralised residential property management platform. This helps to connect leasing, operations and compliance in one place. However, operators attempting to scale across disconnected systems can face higher total costs of ownership and greater operational risk, both of which can have an influence on returns over time.
Managing Investment at Scale
At the investment level, as Simon Scott, lead director – living capital markets at JLL, notes, reporting demands are rising alongside investment volumes. This is particularly significant when considering that North American investors now account for the largest share of UK BTR capital. They bring with them high expectations around data infrastructure and reporting transparency and an investment management platform integrated with a single property management platform can provide the consistency and visibility needed to meet those expectations.
A connected data layer takes this further. When operational and financial information feeds into a single database, reporting becomes more efficient and the risk of manual error is reduced. Yardi’s Data Connect solution draws directly from this live data to produce dynamic, detailed reports for investors and other stakeholders. For North American investors, having timely and reliable data available in this way can provide greater transparency across portfolio performance. Placefirst, a Yardi client, demonstrates the value of this approach, highlighting how Yardi’s data connection feature has strengthened its reporting capabilities and supported greater transparency from an investor perspective. Consequently, operators and asset managers who can manage complex portfolios with precision while providing the reporting investors require will be better positioned to build confidence and support continued capital investment.
Speak to a member of our team to see how Yardi’s end-to-end residential solution can support BTR operators across investment management.
